http://blog.keksrolle.de/2010/03/01/svn-ignores-file-extension-so-by-default-which-corrupted-my-build.html Christoph's thoughts on software development, noteblog and travelling diary. Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:03:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 http://blog.keksrolle.de/2010/03/01/svn-ignores-file-extension-so-by-default-which-corrupted-my-build.html/comment-page-1#comment-69 krankenversicherungsvergleich-2 Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:25:31 +0000 http://blog.keksrolle.de/?p=381#comment-69 thanks for very interesting article. reg. thanks for very interesting article. reg.

]]> http://blog.keksrolle.de/2010/03/01/svn-ignores-file-extension-so-by-default-which-corrupted-my-build.html/comment-page-1#comment-34 Christoph Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:26:19 +0000 http://blog.keksrolle.de/?p=381#comment-34 Maybe normally you shouldn't put that, but in the case I described, it is important that this file is there. if you are versioning 3rd party libs in your svn as it was the case here, then those 3rd party libs should not be corrupted just because I have put them into SVN. Maybe normally you shouldn’t put that, but in the case I described, it is important that this file is there. if you are versioning 3rd party libs in your svn as it was the case here, then those 3rd party libs should not be corrupted just because I have put them into SVN.

]]> http://blog.keksrolle.de/2010/03/01/svn-ignores-file-extension-so-by-default-which-corrupted-my-build.html/comment-page-1#comment-33 frlan Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:18:01 +0000 http://blog.keksrolle.de/?p=381#comment-33 Beside of that subversion is trying to think for the user, an .so shouldn't be put into a VCS IMHO. Beside of that subversion is trying to think for the user, an .so shouldn’t be put into a VCS IMHO.

]]>